查看全部 / View All Logs 上一篇 / ←Previous 下一篇 / Next→
当我处理数据时
While processing the data
August 22nd, 2024
链接如下：archiwenzhou.cn
我将继续往该网站上传内容——它不仅将作为我展示第一阶段干预的平台，还将作为我第二阶段干预的起点。
The good news is that I have successfully set the online archive for the program!!
Here is the link: archiwenzhou.cn
I will keep uploading the content to this site. The site will not only function as the partial presentation of my first intervention, but work as the start of my second intervention.
根据我目前的数据处理情况以及与Mark在最近一次指导课上的讨论，有一些后续任务需要完成。
首先，我需要从学术角度对受访者进行分析。目前的在线档案由经编辑后的受访者故事和观点组成，这些受访者在我的项目中扮演了档案员的角色，但仅进行编辑工作是不够的。
例如，其中一些人可能被定义为专家，他们提供了建设性的建议和意见；而另一些则是目标群体，他们对干预活动给出了反馈，无论是积极的还是消极的。同时，反馈可能以不同的形式出现：他们对事物的评论、对我额外的邀约或其他进一步行动。我应该分析访谈记录之外的内容（例如访谈后与档案员的互动）。
其次，我需要尽快构建在线档案，以便进行下一次干预。实际上，编辑工作非常耗时且耗费精力。正如我在上一篇日志中提到的，每次访谈平均耗时一小时，这已经超出了我的预期。然而，编辑一次访谈实际上需要超过三个小时，包括但不限于信息核实、口音校正和方言识别的时间。导师还建议，最好能改进线上档案库的品牌化。在下次干预之前，该档案库可能需要发展出更好的叙事方式和更清晰的网站主页。
同样重要的是，我应该始终牢记潜在的合作机会，并寻求与地方政府、媒体或其他机构建立联系合作的机会。
Based on my data processing so far and the discussion with Mark during the latest tutorial, there are some subsequent tasks.
First, I need to make the analysis of the interviewees from an academic standpoint. The online archive is currently composed of edited stories and opinions from my interviewees, who played the role as the archivists in my program, but it is not enough to go with the editorial work only.
For example, among them, some might be defined as experts who provided constructive advice and opinions, and some are stakeholders who gave feedback on the intervention, whether positive or not. At the same time, feedback might be in different forms: their comments, their invitations or their further actions. I should analyzed things beyond transcripts of interviews (e.g. the interactions with archivists after the interview).
Second, I need to construct the online archive as soon as possible, for the next intervention. To be honest, the editorial work is quite time-consuming and takes a lot of energy. As I mentioned in the last log, the time for each interview took one hour on average, which has already been longer than my estimation. However, the time for editing one interview actually took more than three hours, including but not being limited by the time for information verification, accent correction and dialect recognition. There is also a suggestion from the tutor that it could be better to improve the branding for the online archive. Before the next intervention, this archive might need better story telling and more clear website home page.
Last but not least, I should always keep the potential cooperation in mind and seek opportunities of connecting local government, media or other institutions.